Contact Information: CONTACT: Leeona Klippstein Spirit of the Sage Council (910) 947-5091 (626) 676-4116 SKYPE - leeona.klippstein Katherine Meyer Meyer, Glitzenstein & Crystal (202) 588-5206 Jon Lovvorn Humane Society of U.S. (202) 955-3669 WEB SITE: http://www.sagecouncil.com http://meyerglitz.com
D.C. Judge Decides That It's OK for More Than 60 Million Acres of Endangered Species Habitat to Be Destroyed Nationwide Says Spirit of the Sage Council
Historic Court Verdict Takes Conservation Out of Habitat Conservation Plans
| Source: Spirit of the Sage Council
WASHINGTON, DC--(Marketwire - September 6, 2007) - D.C. District Court rules Habitat
Conservation Plans do not conserve Conservation Plans nationwide. U.S. Fish
& Wildlife Service have used a loophole exemption clause in the federal
Endangered Species Act to approve over 500 Habitat Conservation Plans for
more than 500 different endangered species and they do not have to provide
conservation or promote recovery.
After ten years, Judge Emmett Sullivan, D.C. District Court, released his
Decision and Order regarding the biggest legal challenge to the federal
Endangered Species Act in history (Spirit of the Sage Council, et al. v.
U.S. Interior Secretary Kempthorne). Released on Thursday, Sullivan's
decision concluded that Habitat Conservation Plans do not conserve or
promote the recovery of federally listed endangered species.
For over a decade, several nonprofit conservation groups, led by Spirit of
the Sage Council, have filed numerous lawsuits against the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries
Service, over the governments Rule Makings that effect hundreds of various
endangered species. The two federal Rules are referred to as No Surprises
and Permit Revocation and are used in over 500 Habitat Conservation Plans
nationwide.
The Sage Council, including the Humane Society of the U.S. and
Mountaineers, contended that the No Surprises Rule was in violation of the
Act and prevented the recovery of endangered species that the Services were
including in Incidental Take Permits with Habitat Conservation Plans. No
Surprises gives an assurance to industry i.e. logging, mining, building and
local governments, that once a permit is issued to them, the federal
government will not ever require them to provide additional conservation
habitat or measures, even when a species is declining in numbers. Sage
Council contended that this sort of permit guarantee could effect a species
ability to recover if it was found that a Habitat Conservation Plan was
inadequate. Since 1994, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has approved
over 500 Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) with Incidental Take Permits,
including No Surprises guarantees, that impact over SIXTY MILLION HABITAT
ACRES.
For the full release please follow this link:
http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire_ID/4193